Disparities Research for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review and Critique of Literature.

IMPORTANCE: Understanding the status of pelvic floor disorder (PFD) disparities research will allow the opportunity to advance future pelvic floor equity efforts. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to (1) characterize the landscape of PFD disparities literature using the 3 phases of disparities research framework, (2) describe the characteristics of PFD disparities studies, and (3) identify critical knowledge gaps. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications addressing disparities in PFDs among U.S. populations from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, or the Cochrane Database indexed between 1997 and 2022. Using the triphasic framework for advancing health disparities research by Kilbourne et al (Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2113-21), we categorized the included studies into the detecting phase (identifies and measures disparities in historically marginalized populations), understanding phase (establishes disparity determinants), or reducing phase (conducts interventions to alleviate inequities). All screening, coding, and quality reviews were independently performed by at least 2 authors. We used descriptive analysis and the χ2 test for comparisons. RESULTS: The initial search identified 10,178 studies, of which 123 were included. Of the included studies, 98 (79.7%), 22 (17.9%), and 3 (2.4%) studies were detecting, understanding, and reducing phase research, respectively. The most common disparity category investigated was race and ethnicity (104 studies), and one third of these studies attributed drivers of racial and ethnic differences to structural influences. Publications of detecting phase studies outpaced the growth of understanding and reducing phase research. CONCLUSIONS: Most PFD disparities research focused on identifying historically marginalized populations with inadequate progression to understanding and reducing phases. We recommend progressing PFD disparities research beyond the detecting phase to advance health equity in PFD care.

Respectful Maternity Care in the United States-Characterizing Inequities Experienced by Birthing People.

OBJECTIVE:  The purpose of this study is to understand experiences of respectful maternity care (RMC) from the perspective of birthing people in the United States from 2013 to 2018. METHODS:  We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of United States birthing people ages 18-50 in April 2018 using SurveyMonkey Audience. Quantitative survey data consisted of demographics and responses to RMC indicators. Qualitative data consisted of comments from individuals regarding their birth experiences. RESULTS:  1036 birthing people participated in the survey. Most births (95%) occurred in hospitals. 16.3% of Black or African American participants reported discrimination compared to 5.5% of participants who did not identify as Black or African American (p < 0.001). Participants who speak a language other than English were also more likely to report discrimination. 19.5% of all respondents felt neglected during their birth experience. Most prevalent experiences of disrespect and mistreatment were related to neglect (most commonly in postpartum phase of care), poor interpersonal communication, lack of respect for patient wishes, negative experience with breastfeeding services, peripartum complications, and discrimination. CONCLUSION FOR PRACTICE: Birthing people in the United States experience many forms of mistreatment, particularly those who identify as Black or African American or speak a language other than English. Patients described experiencing neglect most commonly after birth-an opportunity to improve the provision of RMC postpartum. Strategies to improve quality of maternal health care in the United States should include the provision of RMC as part of a larger effort to reduce inequities in maternal health experiences and outcomes.

Trauma-Informed Care Training in U.S. and Canadian Ob/Gyn Residencies.

This is a cross-sectional study investigating the prevalence and nature of trauma-informed care (TIC) training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. In our sample, 20% of programs had annual TIC training, 53% had less than annual training, and 27% had no training at all. Only 25.3% of respondents were satisfied with their current training in interpersonal trauma and TIC. A lack of facilitators to conduct such training was the primary barrier to implementing TIC. Significant opportunity exists to improve TIC education for Ob/Gyn trainees.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after robotic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Data examining the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on prolapse recurrence after sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is limited. The primary objective of this study was to determine if DM affects prolapse recurrence after robotic SCP. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent robotic SCP between 2012 and 2019 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. The cohort was divided into women with and without DM at the time of SCP. The primary outcome was composite failure. Secondary outcomes included recurrent compartment-specific prolapse, reoperation rates, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Of 547 patients included, 100 had DM. Women with DM were older, had higher BMI, higher parity, and were more likely to be nonwhite. Women with DM had more advanced prolapse at baseline but were not more likely to undergo concomitant procedures at the time of SCP. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 1.3, 3.4), women with DM had significantly increased risk of anterior vaginal prolapse (AVP) recurrence (13% vs 3%, p<0.01), but not composite failure (21% vs 14%, p=0.14). On multivariate regression, women with DM were almost 4 times as likely to experience AVP recurrence over time (AVP hazard ratio (HR) 3.93, 95% CI 1.29-12.03, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, DM was a risk factor for AVP recurrence but not composite failure after robotic SCP.

Gender Representation in U.S. Urogynecology Fellowship Program Leadership.

IMPORTANCE: The proportion of female physicians in the workforce has been steadily increasing, but the proportion of women in department leadership roles across the United States remains low. Urogynecology has the highest representation of women in leadership roles across obstetrics and gynecology and urology subspecialties; however, the proportion of women in leadership roles within urogynecology fellowship programs has not been described previously. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to investigate gender representation within urogynecology fellowship program leadership positions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observational study where urogynecology fellowship program websites were queried for the geographic state as well as the gender expression of the program director and division chair. RESULTS: A total of 68 American Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited urogynecology fellowship programs were queried. Of these, 53 are obstetrics and gynecology-based programs and 15 are urology-based programs. Overall, women represent 67.6% of fellowship directors and 59.2% of division directors. One in 4 female fellowship directors concurrently hold the role of division chair. Women are significantly more likely to be fellowship directors in obstetrics and gynecology-based programs compared with urology-based urogynecology programs (75.4% versus 40.0%; odds ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-14.0). Women are also more likely to be division chairs in obstetrics and gynecology-based compared with urology-based urogynecology programs, although this did not reach statistical significance (63.4% versus 37.5%; odds ratio, 2.9, 95% confidence interval, 0.60-13.8). CONCLUSIONS: Across urogynecology fellowship programs, women are the majority of division chairs and fellowship directors. However, female representation in leadership roles is lagging at urology-based urogynecology programs.

It's not that mesh, is it? What providers should know about the transvaginal mesh controversy.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recent ban on surgical mesh intended for the transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse has called into question the safety of surgical mesh implants in general. As the media firestorm around vaginal mesh kits has continued to grow, important details about the specific type of mesh involved have been lost in the public discourse surrounding the controversy. This has left healthcare providers across the nation in the difficult position of addressing patient anxieties about the use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. This review seeks to educate women's health providers on the historical background and various uses of the different types of mesh in gynecologic surgery.

Addressing racial bias in wards.

Health disparities fall along racial lines, in part, due to structural inequalities limiting health care access. The concept of race is often taught in health professions education with a clear biologic underpinning despite the significant debate in the literature as to whether race is a social or biologic construct. The teaching of race as a biologic construct, however, allows for the simplification of race as a risk factor for disease. As health care providers, it is part of our professional responsibility and duty to patients to think and talk about race in a way that is cognizant of broader historical, political, and cultural literature and context. Openly discussing the topic of race in medicine is not only uncomfortable but also difficult given its controversies and complicated context. In response, we provide several evidence-based steps to guide discussions around race in clinical settings, while also hopefully limiting the use of bias and racism in the practice of medicine.

Perspectives on Hypertension in the New England Cape Verdean Community.

This study characterizes patient understanding of hypertension and its management in a Cape Verdean immigrant community. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with Cape Verdean Creole-speaking adults about their beliefs and behaviors regarding hypertension. Fourteen women and six men ages 35-87 were interviewed. The majority of the participants believed hypertension is symptomatic, with headache being the most common symptom. Many reported taking anti-hypertensive medication, though some took medication only when they felt symptoms. The majority were unfamiliar with a normal blood pressure reading. Most believed hypertension is related to stress and salt intake, though few reported making the recommended lifestyle changes. None of the participants communicated with physicians in their native language, relying instead on interpreters, family members or other languages to communicate. Participants identified language as a serious barrier to care. Our sample had a poor understanding of hypertension as a chronic, asymptomatic disease. Given the high prevalence of hypertension in this community, and the unavailability of Cape Verdean Creole-speaking interpreters and providers for individual patient visits, Cape Verdean patients may benefit from group education or medical visits conducted in Creole.